parasite parasite parasite


Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Whereas, in Christian Byzantium at this time and in Europe up until the 18th and 19th century slavery was...well, it was booming! And nobody spoke against it in the Bible, including Jesus (SAW). However, in the Sahih Bukhari, we find an entire book on Manumission (buying freedom for slaves) as well as many prescriptions for doing it.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
We also find the Prophet prohibiting slave owners from beating their slaves and he himself freeing more than one slave.
01andak in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
And again, the Book of Numbers describes in one incident with Moses a geometrically greater number of captive virgins than all the captives taken by all the Muslim armies during the life of Muhammad.
01andak in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Oh wow! Take as many sex slaves as you want, but dont beat them! Well sorry! But thats a lie as well! If you can beat your wives you can beat your slaves!
Again you are a LIAR! Show me the evidence that you cannot beat your wife or your slave! Sex slaves are not held in higher regard then wives! And YOU can beat your wives!
YOUR A LIAR!
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Again your a liar! Prove that that the number was greateer than all of the number of slaves Mohamed took!
Saying something and proving it are two different things!
Here I will act like you, a liar with no integrity!
Mohamed took 5 billion captives and raped every single one of them!
There thats equal to your fallacious lies and assertions!
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
LOL! Nobody spoke out against slavery? Are you insane? Your lying again! Jesus spoke against slavery! LIAR! The abolitionists were Christian. And the last nations on the face of the planet to abolish slavery were Islamic. And only under pressure from the West!
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Muhammad according to Maududi freed as many as 63 slaves. At least 2 and possibly 3 of his wives were given to him as slaves and he freed them. The size of his house only fit about 10 people including him and his wives. It is doubtful he ever owned more than 2 or 3 slaves at any given time. Compare to George Washington's over 300 slaves or Slaves, obey your earthly masters with deep respect and fear. Serve them sincerely as you would serve Christ. (Ephesians 6:5 NLT)
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
I'm not embarrassed by any of Islamic history. I might be if I studied Christian history and found it to be superior, but what I see Christians are equally capable of using religion for violence as Muslims. Christians are just as prone or not to force conversions and to oppress nonbelievers as Muslims. Christians have used force in every single region they have inhabited. And I haven't found atheists to be any better.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
In short, all the things you've found to criticize Muslims about are problems of humans, not Muslims alone. You're so eager to judge us and eradicate us that you lost track of your own hypocrisy.
01andak in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Again you show yourself ignorant. Islamic scholars didn't translate because it wasn't necessary. Scholars of Islam uniformly read Arabic much like scholars of Christianity, true scholars, must learn Latin, Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic. Just like there are many untranslated works of Christian doctrine in Latin, so most Islamic scholarship is in Arabic.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
È stato segnalato come spam mostra
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Rispondi
Hind Bint Utbah, one of the people you mention as not a murderer ordered the death of the Prophet's uncle and ate his liver. That's innocent I suppose in your eyes.
01andak in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Where did I say that would be innocent? So because one of them were a criminal does not mean they all were. Like I said, many of them were slaughtered just for critcizing Mohamed! LIke this!
Putting words in my mouth and making vast generalizations does not an argument make! As usual you have no integrity!
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Sahih Bukhari
Volume 5, Book 59, Number 369:
Narrated Jabir bin 'Abdullah:
Allah's Apostle said, "Who is willing to kill Ka'b bin Al-Ashraf who has hurt Allah and His Apostle?" Thereupon Muhammad bin Maslama got up saying, "O Allah's Apostle! Would you like that I kill him?" The Prophet said, "Yes," Muhammad bin Maslama said, "Then allow me to say a (false) thing (i.e. to deceive Kab). "The Prophet said, "You may say it."
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
You had previously assumed none of them was guilty of anything. Finding that one of them ordered murders and committed cannibalism doesn't sway you in the least. Can you list for me why every member of the Tribe of Ai deserved to be killed? All 13,000? What about the 450 priests that were killed by your prophet Elijah? What was their crime?
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
But of course you've got your new covenant! Why then, 2000 years after the new covenant do we find Christians murdering and raping in every corner of the globe? Why do we find some of them even today justifying Armageddon and a genocide of all Muslim people in the service of Israel? Should I judge Christianity by these people the way you judge Islam? Well I won't.
01andak in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
È stato segnalato come spam mostra
01andak in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Rispondi
È stato segnalato come spam mostra
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Rispondi
È stato segnalato come spam mostra
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Rispondi
È stato segnalato come spam mostra
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Rispondi
È stato segnalato come spam mostra
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Rispondi
È stato segnalato come spam mostra
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Rispondi
È stato segnalato come spam mostra
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Rispondi
È stato segnalato come spam mostra
01andak in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Rispondi
So you cannot disprove the factual ebidence that i presented. So are you saying that this is not a fact?
If it isnt please produce the evidence that proves that these are not historical accounts. There is all of the evidence of what they did! They spoke disparagingly (told the truth) about Mohamed, his hypocrisy, and his murderous immoral ways!
The crusaders were men! Not Prophets! Nobody is told to follow the example of the Crusaders or Saladin. More logical fallacies!
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
You want me to prove a negative, but you have nothing with which to prove a positive. Outside of Ishaq, there is no detailed story of the Banu Qurayza. You have to repeat it again and again, because there is little else to talk about. If the story is true, that makes Muhammad 10 times as merciful as Moses of the Bible.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
And why are you comparing Evil Islamic doctrine to secular rules and laws? You really are a fool.
If you want to compare religious doctrines that would be one thing. But you dont say look at this religious teaching and then compare it to say Ghengas Khans actions.
And Mohamed was a hypocrite, child molesting, rapist, serial killer. Not to mention a fascist, bigot!
All you do is use logical fallacies! And up to this point everything you have said is absolutely false and ridiculous!
Thedickknows 7 mesi fa
It's your opinion that it's evil. Since you've confined your learning to answering islam and other Christian and atheist sites, I'm not surprised. Perhaps I should go on Muslim sites to learn everything I need to know about Judaism? No. That would be just plain ignorant. Well then, when I meet the Rabbi, I'll start by calling him a liar? Perish the thought! Who would consider that learning? You apparently
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
The story is actually from Ishaq and Hisham! So that is at least two chains of narration. And they are historians just like Bukhari is a historian! Your attempts are feeble and childish at best! I didnt know that Answering Islam was an Islamic source. Are you saying that these historical accounts are only found there? Because that would be another outright lie.
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Ah oh! More hypocrisy!
Book 14, Number 2665:
Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu'minin: “ No woman of Banu [tribe] Qurayzah was killed except one. She was with me, talking and laughing on her back and belly (extremely), while the Apostle of Allah . . . was killing her people with the swords. Suddenly a man called her name: Where is so-and-so?
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Continued:
. . . I asked: What is the matter with you? She said: I did a new act. [Aisha] said: The man took her and beheaded her. [Aisha] said: I will not forget that she was laughing extremely although she knew that she would be killed.” (Abu Dawud)
Was he punished for it? Nope? Whats the punishment for murder?
No muslim should be killed for killing an unbeliever (Sahih Bukhari 1:3:11)
Further evidence of Islams bigotry! Hypocrisy!
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Whats not terrorism? Mohamed admitted he was a terrorist
Bukhari (52:220) - Allah's Apostle said... 'I have been made victorious with terror'
I would say going from town to town massacring, raping and pillaging from all non members of your death cult is terrorism!
Quran (9:123) - "O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness."
Tabari 9:69 "Killing Unbelievers is a small matter to us"
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Considering that the term terrorism only dates from the French Revolution, I seriously doubt it.
Would you hold to this view if the person in question was Joshua, Moses, King David, King Richard the Lionhearted who massacred 4500 Muslim prisoners. What about the defenders of Vienna? Did they have a right to fight the unbelievers at their gates? Should they have shown mercy and let the Muslims take the city?
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
BWAHAHAHA! If the term terrorism did not exist prior top the French revolution terrorism didnt exist prior!
BWAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHA! OMG your a Moron!
Of course they should not have let them invade, rape, and slaughter the people in their city! Just like YOUr Prophet did in the sunna that you are suppose to be following!
LOL! Your such a scum bag imbecile liar!
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
That's actually Jewish hallachic law. A Jew cannot be killed for killing a non-Jew. Similar laws were used by Christians against Jews in Europe.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Ishaq and Hisham is not a chain of narration. You show yourself a pseudo-scholar at every turn. Not surprising since you simply paste your arguments without any knowledge of what they say.
A chain of hadith narration (isnad) must go back to a contemporary who was a companion of the Prophet. Ishaq was born over a century after Muhammad's death and Hisham even later. Ishaq based a number of his stories on oral narratives of his contemporaries.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Yes there is orders to punish a specific people, in a specific time, and a specific place! But unlike Islam no where are Jews or Christians commanded to subjugate or slaughter all non Jews or Christians!
YOU ARE A LYING SCUM BAG! And we already went over this! But you have no integrity at all!
Just like your child molesting rapist, serial killer false Pervert Prophet!
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
"The Prophet had suddenly attacked Bani Mustaliq without warning while they were heedless and their cattle were being watered at the places of water. Their fighting men were killed and their women and children were taken as captives" (Bukhari 46:717)
Oh wow, Mohamed attacked a defenseless people and killed the men and took the children and women as slaves! Guess what happened to the women? They were raped!
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur’anic verse: (Sura 4:24) "And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess." (Abu Dawud 2150, also Muslim 3433)
YOU ARE A DISGUSTING PERSON WHO WILL LIE AND SAY JUST ABOUT ANYTHING TO DEFEND EVIL ISLAM!
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Sorry to rain on your private party. In the Bible, it's God, not some prophet that orders the death of tribe after tribe. And in the New Testament, the witches are sent to death and the Jews are seen only as the murderers of Christ.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Sorry to inform you but it was the Romans who killed Jesus! DUH! And YES God did order the death of some people! Specific tribes of people at a specific time and place! Not all non Jews liar!
Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger
Bukhari (8:387) - Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah'.
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Genocidal commands!
Bukhari (52:177) - Allah's Apostle said, "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him."
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
You're not informing me of anything. I'm just stating what is found repeatedly in the New Testament.
John 7: 12 And there was much murmuring among the multitudes concerning him: some said, He is a good man; others said, Not so, but he leadeth the multitude astray.
7: 13 Yet no man spake openly of him for fear of the Jews.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
John 8:44 (Jesus to the Jewish Pharasees) You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
01andak in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
È stato segnalato come spam mostra
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Rispondi
È stato segnalato come spam mostra
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Rispondi
È stato segnalato come spam mostra
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Rispondi
My assertion is, and correctly, that verses like those above lead to centuries of oppression for Jews in Christian Europe. Jews were massacred, outlawed, exiled and robbed repeatedly. There was always someone from the church to justify what was done including the various Inquisitions and burnings at the stake.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
È stato segnalato come spam mostra
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Rispondi
So now what we see is you being a hypocrite. Mohamed being a hypocrite and Islam saying to kill only the child that will grow up to be a non Muslim.
Mohamed had several women slaughtered. One being a very old woman who he ripped apart by being drawn and quartered.
So far everything you say is false. And it is against the law for the U.S. or any person of the armed forces to target children. But Islam permits executed children on the sole basis of them being non Muslim! Your a liar & hypocrite
Thedickknows 7 mesi fa
It doesn't say that at all. Quote the whole hadith and it says the Prophet did NOT kill children. Now where does it say that you should do something the Prophet did NOT do??? Nowhere, that's where. Again, as usual, you are substituting your interpretation for the actual words. If you didn't, you'd look like the fool you are.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Book 019, Number 4457 minus the chain of narrators:
The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) used not to kill the children, so thou shouldst not kill them unless you could know what Khadir had known about the child he killed, or you could distinguish between a child who would grow up to he a believer (and a child who would grow up to be a non-believer), so that you killed the (prospective) non-believer and left the (prospective) believer aside.
01andak in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
You should be asking who was Khadir? Khadir was an elder man mentioned in Surah Baqarah who could see the future. We cannot see the future and therefore should not follow his example, AS THE HADITH STATES.
01andak in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
I know who and what Khadir did! Not how is your dilemma. It gives a qualifier. It says OR!
or you could distinguish between a child who would grow up to he a believer (and a child who would grow up to be a non-believer), so that you killed the (prospective) non-believer and left the (prospective) believer aside.
So it says to kill the non Muslim child if you could distinguish between a non Muslim child and a Muslim child. Leaving the Muslim child alone! Nice try liar!
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
If you speak with a Rabbi and you catch him lying in every interaction you have with him, then you should call him a liar.
And by no means are you an Imaam. I have refuted and exposed you in every single issue!
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Who acts as though civilians are nothing?
MOHAMED DOES!
It is reported on the authority of Sa'b b. Jaththama that the Prophet of Allah (may peace be upon him), when asked about the women and children of the polytheists being killed during the night raid, said: “They are from them.” (Sahih Muslim 4322, see also Bukhari 52:256)
He says dont worry about it, they are from them! Who>? The pagans! The worst of creatures! Your a hypocrite!
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Your a liar! This is exactly what it says! I am not writing it! These are not my words!
thou shouldst not kill them unless you could know what Khadir had known about the child he killed, or you could distinguish between a child who would grow up to he a believer (and a child who would grow up to be a non-believer), so that you killed the (prospective) non-believer and left the (prospective) believer aside. (Sahih Muslim 4457)
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
It doesn't say that, and you've lied about that before. Having a woman executed is not the same as slaughtering her if she had your uncle killed and ate his liver. But I know. You can't stop yourself from lying.
Again, you repeat the same lie. The prophet forbade killing women and children according to a hadith I've posted here. The example you gave was not for targetting, but for collateral damage. I guess calling me a liar at the same time you tell huge lies works with ignorant folk.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
god bless wafa!
bcfcbilly 7 mesi fa
01andak has no integrity at all. He continue to appeal to cherry picking historical events to prove that Islam is peaceful and Christianity is not. But of course I have told him 18 times now that I am not condemning or criticizing all Muslims. I am critical of Islamic doctrine!
But he cant keep the conversation of topic! He want s to try and demonize me and project that I am saying that all Muslims are evil and want to kill!
I NEVER SAID THAT!
ISLAM IS EVIL,. NOT ALL MUSLIMS!
Thedickknows 7 mesi fa
Look, if you hold that people are following an evil doctrine, then you dehumanize them. One fifth of the world follows this doctrine that you hold to be so evil. Now you claim that we don't understand our own religion and you do. Who has no integrity? If I hold myself out to be an expert on Mathematics though I'm not a mathematician and then call mathematicians liars, what have I proven??? You hold yourself out to be more of an expert on Islam than Muslims
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
You say we don't know our own religion. Then you quote out of context quotes and out of context historical events to prove it. What you've missed is the core meaning of Islam. You haven't touched upon it anywhere here. Do you know the meaning of Tauhid? Do the five pillars of Islam hold any meaning for you? Or are you stuck in obscure facets of Islam that we have little or no concern for whether you say so or not?
01andak in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
I am not saying all Muslims dont know their religion. I am saying that Muslims are selective and choose not to accept it in it's totality! You want me to focus on the core beliefs and forget that Islam is an all encompassing ideology! From governemnt to marital relations to how to use thje bathroom! An Ideology is the sum total of it's parts. Not just one or two aspects!
You do everything you can,. lie, misrepresent, delfect, and use logical fallacies to defend Islam! Why?
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
È stato segnalato come spam mostra
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Rispondi
Quran (9:30) - "And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!"
Now I want you to admit that Allah dehumanizes all non Muslims!
But you wont! Because you have to be a hypocrite and liar to defend your revisionist version of Islam! Your version doesnt exist!
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
He doesn't. If the creator of all things decided to dehumanize non-Muslims, they would in fact not be human. Are you human? I thought so!
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
So you admit that you are ignoring the core beliefs. Even assuming Islam is all encompassing, wouldn't core beliefs be, well, more core than things that according to you most Muslims don't follow anyway?
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
LOL! Another weak attempt at demonizing and minimizing my argument! I am not assuming anything. I am accurately depicting and describing. Are you denying? No, your using more deceitful tactics. What core beliefs did I say Muslims dont follow? I will approach this differently. Since you use every lie and unscrupulous tactic to try and defend Islam and your posting! Once again you reveal your lack of integrity!
And here you go again, when your trapped you deflect! Be consistent!
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
È stato segnalato come spam mostra
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Rispondi
È stato segnalato come spam mostra
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Rispondi
LOL! No I dont! I hold that the ideology is evil, fascist,bigoted misogynistic, intolerant and violent! But I am not speaking to all Muslim people! It's no wonder your a Muslim! You are incapable of critical thinking!
My contention is that one fifth of the world who call themselves Muslims are not following the true doctrine of Islam! If they were, the world would be a far worse place then it is now!
You just like to put words in my mouth and misrepresent everything I say! U have 2!
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Muslims have a motivation to defend and reinterpret and be selective in their understanding and practice of Islam. You have an emotional attachment! You see it all the time how Muslims elevate Mohamed to a near God like stature! Look at the lengths you go to to deflect from Islamic doctrine and appeal to history or isolated incidents of Muslims being kind to others in order to portray Islam as a tolerant religion! When it clearly is not according to doctrine and sunna!
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
You keep saying I am quoting out of context, but you fail to even attempt to put anything in context! In fact I am the one who is putting it into context. I am the one using The Quran, hadith and tafsirs! While you continue to misrepresent history and my statements! And you dont have to be a Muslim to be an expert! And you certainly will not be objective if you are! Does a botanist have to be a flower? More logical fallacies!
you do everything you can to avoid Islamic doctrine!
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Let me correct you again. Muslims do not hold Muhammad to anywhere near a godlike status. For one example of many, it is forbidden to pray at the tomb of the Prophet lest anyone confuse that he is anything more than human and pray to him. Our whole religion is about something other than Muhammad. He is only the messenger and understood by every Muslim to have been human and not a god. But you're lucky that none of your audience will research what I'm saying. Make up anything.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Correct me again? When did you correct me the first time? I refuted everything you have said! EVERYTHING! Can I take the shahada without saying my allegiance to Mohamed as the final Prophet?
Surely Allah and His angels pray on the Prophet; O you who believe! pray on him and salute him with a (becoming) salutation. Those who annoy Allah and his Apostle Allah has cursed them in this world and in the Hereafter and has prepared for them a humiliating Punishment. S. 33:56-57
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Final prophet is not equal to God. You said we treat Muhammad like a god. We don't, and whether you admit it or not, not one in all the Muslims in the world would agree with you. That is your opinion which has nothing to do with Islam and is so far off as to be insulting.
33:56 : Lo! Allah and His angels shower blessings on the Prophet. O ye who believe! Ask blessings on him and salute him with a worthy salutation.
Shower blessings is not pray on. Whose translation?
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
DO Muslims kill people for depicting Mohamed>? Yes! Do Muslims kill people for burning the Quran? Yes!
I know what Muslims say, but their actions contradict their words. It's always the same thing, Redefining words and contradictions and hypocrisy! In fact Allah prays for Mohamed.
It may be that thy Lord will raise thee to an exalted station. S. 17:79
Did We not exalt thy fame? S. 94:1-4
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Do Christians go house to house killing Muslims? Well, one did just last week, so by your same logic they do. What percentage of Muslims kill people for depicting Muhammad? .0001?  And how many Muslims killed people for burning a Quran? 100?? Out of 1,200,000,000. Well, hey, if a smear works, use it on everybody.
That verse does not say that Allah prays to Muhammad. Why would it??? Exalt doesn't mean to worship. Look it up!
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
BWAHAHAH! Same argument that i refuted multiple times. Did Jesus command to do this, or did he ever do such a thing? LOL! Of course not! But Muslims are and do! How many times are you going to repeat this flawed argument!
Quran (9:123) - "O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness."
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
See you dont even care about truth, all you care about is defending Islam no matter how unscrupulous and illogical your argument is! Its irrelevant how many. And first prove your statistics. The fact remains that it is not permitted to depict Mohamed or burn the Quran. And Islam does condone subjugating or slaughtering all non Muslims for all eternity!
Exalt to praise, glorify, honor, intensify, or heighten. It is most often used in religious contexts.
Exaltation becoming like God.
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
* تفسير Tafsir al-Jalalayn
O you who believe, fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you, that is, the nearest, followed by the next nearest of them, and let them find harshness in you, that is, severity, in other words, be harsh with them, and know that God is with the pious, helping and granting [them] victory.
So you criticize the person who goes house to house killing, even though you cannot find justification, now criticize Islam because there is justification.
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
That wasn't the interpretation of the Crusaders! They were told by the Pope, the highest authority on Christianity at the time that what they did was consistent with Christianity. The Spanish Inquisition interpreted it their way. Savanarola his. Now you're telling me that Bin Laden's interpretation is the only valid one? You're plain full of it.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
LOL! The Pope is not the definition of Christianity!
YOU HAVE NO INTEGRITY AT ALL!
Really it was coinsistant with Christianity then? OK show me where Jesus said to kill non Christians and when and where he did it.
Your a liar and you disgust me! Where did I use Bin Ladens interpretation?
I used your Quran,. hadith and tafsirs from your greatest scholars. I didnt know Bin Laden wrote the Quran,. hadith or tafsirs? No your full of it! And I have proven it time after time!
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
You're right, I never did. You're still sitting in your own pile of ignorance and bigotry. You think we worship Muhammad or that we want to kill everybody who doesn't agree with us. I'd ask how you come up with such garbage, but I see the same tripe repeated daily on Pat Robertson or CBN or half a dozen evangelical sites.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
So telling the truth and showing the Quran, hadith and tafsirs is ignorance and bigotry? I never said you want to kill anyone!
NOW THIS IS THE 20TH TIME I HAVE SAID THIS! BUT YOU CANT HELP FROM LYING AND TRYING TO DEMONIZE ME!
I am talking about Islamic doctrine! What garbage? I didnt write the Quran, hadith or tafsirs? Muslims did! You cannot refute the factual statements I made about Islamic doctrine and Mohameds sunna so you have to continue to appeal to people! Your apthetic!
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Instead of using logical fallacies and adhiomuinums why cant you refute what I say about Islam?
Using your illogical nonsense nobody should be able to criticize Nazism, communism, Satanism, Fascism, etc..
Yet the Quran criticizes and demonizes all non Muslims and commands Muslims to subjugate or kill us! But for the 21st time I am not saying that all Muslims follow the commands! They are selective in what they want to accept and practice!
I HAVE SAID THIS 21 TIMES!
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
This is far worse than what Hitler said. Islam incorporates a deity to their fascism and bigotry! Genocide commanded!
Bukhari (52:177) - Allah's Apostle said, "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him."
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
So far, you've taken verses completely out of historical context, presented me interpretations of hadith that are ridiculous posted a translation that is unrecognizeable and covered for a woman that wants to nuke Mecca. You haven't even begun to speak about Islamic doctrine. Every time I bring up the five pillars or Tauhid or any other central belief, you dismiss it. Well, you have to don't you?
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Prove I have taken one single verse out of context. You saying so is not evidence of your claim. In fact I am the only one who put them into context. All you have done is say they are out of context without proving it.
As I have said probably 3 or 4 times the five [pillars of Islam are not the complete picture of Islam. You are commanded to follow all of Islam, not just the parts you like! I dont have to follow all of Islam, you do, and not just the parts you feel are not embarrassing!
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Islam is not just the five pillars. Which are still not morally profound. The Zakat cannot be used for non Muslim poor. It is forbidden to use the zakat to feed kafre poor. And you are told to not listen to or respect non Muslim family members, including parents!
Qur'an (9:23) - "O ye who believe! Choose not your fathers nor your brethren for friends if they take pleasure in disbelief rather than faith. Whoso of you taketh them for friends, such are wrong-doers"
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Now for the 22nd time. Stop referencing and appealing to people in history who used Christianity as a political tool. Go to the doctrine. Oh yeah, you cant. You have to defend Islam by logical fallacies, deflection and lies.
Notice how I am the only one presenting the factual evidence from YOUR Islamic doctrine? While all you can do is appeal to logical fallacies?
Now tell me exactly what I took out of context!
YOU ARE EXPOSED AND REFUTED! YOU HAVE ZERO INTEGRITY< LIKE MOHAMED
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Well, I can't got to the Bible and find the doctrine. That was decided in numerous eccumenical councils hosted by Roman Emperors. As a result, the Arians and any other group considered heretics were ruthlessly hunted down and exterminated. Read about the Arian heresy, where Arians considered Jesus separate from God the father. That sounds a bit familiar to me.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
But the Quran defines Christians as people of the Book. Pleasure in disbelief would be something different. Christians are not seen by Muslims as disbelievers, but rather as fellow believers with differing views. The Quran is highly critical of Christians and Jews that, in historic context worked to destroy the early Muslims. One proof is the famously overquoted passage about monkeys and apes. The monkeys and apes are Jews who didn't observe Jewish sabbath!
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
I already have. If the verses read like you say, then Muhammad himself didn't follow Islam. Why didn't he kill everybody in Mecca? Why was one single Jew left in Arabia after 13+ centuries of strict Muslim rule? Why would even one Jew escape Spain and flee TO Muslims if Muslims were Nazis like you say?
No the pillars aren't the complete picture. That's only what EVERY Muslim practices EVERYDAY. Not what a very few Muslims do once in a while.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
And if you say I'm not following Islam by not taking up lesser Jihad, then you assume that there are no rules in Jihad concerning when it is proper and when it is not. That is a lie. Although the 52nd Book (arranged by importance) is about l Jihad, it contains much in it that is compatible with the rules of war as defined today. For that matter, following its rules, the 9/11 hijackers would not have existed. Women and children cannot be targetted as part of Jihad.
01andak in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
They may as well have. With much less scholarship than the original authors and with preconceptions and hate bias, they have created a profitable industry. Write anything negative about Muslims and you've got a best seller. The fact these authors totally ignore any history or facts that doesn't prove their stereotypes is irrelevant to an ignorant readership.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Out of the context of Christian intolerance, imperialism and rapine, the fact that Muslim imperialists acted as they did seems extraordinary. But in fact, the Christian conversion of Europe, South America and North America was extremely violent and included millions of forced conversions and massacres. If there were still theocracies like that of the Plymouth Bay Colony, we'd still be burning witches. It's only thanks to secularism that we don't.
01andak in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
And that secularism has nothing to do with Christianity. The freedom of religion in the Bill of Rights was the opposite of what generations of Americans pushed for. If we give in to the forces from the right, we'll have another Christian theocracy where non-Christians and others that don't tow the line are persecuted.
01andak in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
The freedom of religion and the Bill of rights were sprung from Judeo Christian values. Christianity was the imputus for the American constitution and the Bibll of Rights. They fled nations to practice their own religion! Your a liar and you have no integrity and you continue to appeal to people in history as a means to prove that Islamic doctrine is not fascist, bigoted and intolerant! That not how it works! I am talking about Islamic doctrine for the 17th time!
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
The fact of the matter is that if you kill in the name of Jesus you are contradicting his actions and teachings, if you kill in the name of Islams Allah you are following his direct commands and the actions of Mohamed. And Muslims are still executed witches! You want to appeal to people. OK!
12/12 2011
A Saudi woman has been executed for practising "witchcraft and sorcery", the country's interior ministry says.
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Yes there was Christian intolerance. But it cannot be found in the Christian doctrine! Unlike of course the Islamic doctrine!
Luke [27] "But I tell you who hear me: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, [28] bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you.
Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger
Now compare!
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Ok you want to appeal to atrocities? Well unlike the acts you flasely attribute to Christianity! LOL! Islam actually condones forced conversion of killing of all non Muslims!
Famous Belgian historian Koenraad Elst wrote:
The Blitzkrieg of the Muslim armies in the first decades after the birth of their religion had such enduring results precisely because the Pagan populations in West- and Central-Asia had no choice (except death) but to convert.
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
The Muslim conquests, down to the 16th century, were for the Hindus a pure struggle of life and death. Entire cities were burnt down and the populations massacred, with hundreds of thousands killed in every campaign, and similar numbers deported as slaves. Every new invader made his hills of Hindus skulls. Thus, the conquest of Afghanistan in the year 1000 was followed by the annihilation of the Hindu population; the region is still called the Hindu Kush, i.e. Hindu slaughter.
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
So, every single Muslim combat at that time gets a mention as a proof of Muslim violence? What about Christian violence of contemporaries.
629 - Heraclius Christian Roman Emporor outlaws Judaism and massacres over 10,000 Jews
629 - King Dagobert of France proposes to drive all Jews who will not accept Christianity into exile.
782 - 4,500 Saxons beheaded at Verden for refusing to convert to Christianity
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
620 - Sisibur of Spain institutes forced baptism for children of mixed marriage and eventually expulsion of the Jews.
630 - In Spain Christians found practicing Judaism have their children removed and sent to monestaries
01andak in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Ok this is the 16th time I have said this. No I am not talking about Muslims violence. I am talking about Islamic doctrine!
YOU KEEP MAKING THE LIE OF A LOGICAL FALLACY THAT I AM REFERRING TO PEOPLE! I AN REFERRING TO ISLAMIC DOCTRINE!
YOU HAVE NO INTEGRITY!
And it was Mohamed who was relentless to the Meccans and would not stop imposing himself and his views on them! Mohamed was the intolerant one until they got fed up!
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
It was a Christian king in a predominantly Christian land who gave the small, persecuted community of early Muslims in the beginning of the Prophet Muhammad's mission protection. Muslims were welcomed, protected and lived in peace with the Christians of Habasha. That is of course until Mohamed gained enough followers and wealth to impose his fascist bigoted ideology on others!
Thedickknows 7 mesi fa
You're talking about Ethiopia where about a third of the population today is Muslim.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
È stato segnalato come spam mostra
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Rispondi
Yeah, the problem is that I know the story well because I'm Muslim and we study this stuff. It's not important to you because an Abyssinian king finding that "There is less difference between our religions than two beams of light from the same lantern." kind of spoils your fun.  You'd like it to be that Muslims and Christians did nothing but war, but it isn't so.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Another logical fallacy. Are you saying I cannot know the story or the doctrine of Islam because I reject it? LOL! So your going to appeal to an Assyrian Prince as the final authority on Islam. Thats another logical fallacy.
Straw man argument. No I dont want war, Islam wants war. I am just providing the evidence that Islam is a fascist, bigoted intolerant, misogynistic death cult bent on the subjugation or death of all non Muslims! But all you can do is appeal to outside sources!
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Yes, fight the people of the Book!
Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Your correct. Mohamed didnt follow the Islam of your imagination!
Ali [and said]: “Proceed on and do not look about until Allah grants you victory,” and Ali went a bit and then halted and did not look about and then said in a loud voice: “Allah's Messenger, on what issue should I fight with the people?” Thereupon he (the Prophet) said: ”Fight with them until they bear testimony to the fact that there is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his Messenger…” (Sahih Muslim 5917)
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Ah OH! You say women and children cannot be killed? I guess Mohamed was a false Prophet!
It is reported on the authority of Sa'b b. Jaththama that the Prophet of Allah (may peace be upon him), when asked about the women and children of the polytheists being killed during the night raid, said: “They are from them.” (Sahih Muslim 4322, see also Bukhari 52:256)
Well how can that be? Have you noticed yet that every time you make a direct comment about Islam you are wrong? LOL!
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
I never mentioned a lesser jihad! But Allah and Mohamed did!
Quran (9:41) - "Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew."
Muslim (20:4696) - "the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: 'One who died but did not fight in the way of Allah nor did he express any desire (or determination) for Jihid died the death of a hypocrite.'"
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Muslim (1:33) - the Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah
Bukhari (8:387) - Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah'. Ishaq 992: - "Fight everyone in the way of Allah and kill those who disbelieve in Allah."
Tabari 9:69 "Killing Unbelievers is a small matter to us"
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
I said that woman and children cannot be TARGETTED. Our own modern rules of war allow women and children to be killed as "colateral damage". So, in modern context an American soldier hearing that civilians were killed by a drone plane says that they were not deliberately targetted, it's acceptable. A night attack that may expose civilians to danger is also acceptable in modern context. Targetting non-combattants deliberately is not in either context.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
You'll find also in the rules of Jihad that combattant women or children can be attacked. That also agrees with modern western rules of engagement.
Bukhari 019:4319.
It is narrated on the authority of 'Abdullah that a woman was found killed in one of the battles fought by the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him). He disapproved of the killing of women and children.
01andak in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Malik's Muwatta
Book 021, Hadith Number 009.
Section : Prohibition against Killing Women and Children in Military Expeditions.
Yahya related to me from Malik from Nafi from Ibn Umar that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, saw the corpse of a woman who had been slain in one of the raids, and he disapproved of it and forbade the killing of women and children.
01andak in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
So, we see that killing of women and children BY ACCIDENT during a night raid is acceptable, just as it is in modern rules of engagement. TARGETTING women and children, the words I used, not what you put in my mouth, is forbidden, just as I claimed.
01andak in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
LOL! Its not by accident! They are considered collateral damage! And Mohamed says they are of them! As if saying they are nothing! So do not be concerned! Why? Because they are one of them!
Nice reinterpretation you have there! Now let me recount the murders Mohamed committed of women for the soul reason they criticized him and wrote poetry! Oh no, poetry! LOL!
Your such a liar and a hypocrite! You lack any and all semblance of integrity!
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
When the Allah-inspired prophet heard what she had said, he asked, "Who will rid me of Marwan’s daughter?" A member of her husband’s tribe volunteered and crept into her house that night. She had five children, and the youngest was sleeping at her breast. The assassin gently removed the child, drew his sword, and plunged it into her, killing her in her sleep.
The following morning, the assassin defied anyone to take revenge. Ibn Ishaq, pp. 675-76 / 995-96.
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Actually, that isn't even a hadith. Ibn Ishaq was a biographer, not a hadith specialist like Bukhari. Without a chain of narrators, that is a single source story. You choose to believe it because it describes everything you think our prophet was. And you've pasted that translation from Answering Islam.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
We allow collateral damage of civilians in an area of attack today. How is this different? We act as though the civilians killed in collateral damage are nothing or next to nothing in Afghanistan and Iraq. That wasn't targetting women and children in the case of the hadith and it isn't in the case of American troops.
I know of one instance of a weak (of doubtful origin) hadith that claims that a woman poet was executed. Wafa Sultan quotes it and of course you do.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
AH OH! Do I see a contradiction?
thou shouldst not kill them unless you could know what Khadir had known about the child he killed, or you could distinguish between a child who would grow up to he a believer (and a child who would grow up to be a non-believer), so that you killed the (prospective) non-believer and left the (prospective) believer aside. (Sahih Muslim 4457)
OR YOU COULD DISTINGUISH A MUSLIM CHILD FROM A NON MUSLIM CHILD!
NOW THIS IS DEPRAVITY AND BIGOTRY AT ITS WORST!
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Why don't you quote the whole hadith???
The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) USED NOT to kill the children, so ,,,thou shouldst not kill them...
Khadir for those of you who don't know Arabic means fate. So, this hadith, whether you like it or not says that the Prophet didn't kill children and you shouldn't either. I.E. A MUSLIM SHOULD NOT KILL CHILDREN. Thanks for proving my point.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Colateral damage! Isnt that exactly what this is? LOL! Your such a moronic hypocrite!
Bukhari (52:256) - The Prophet... was asked whether it was permissible to attack the pagan warriors at night with the probability of exposing their women and children to danger. The Prophet replied, "They (i.e. women and children) are from them (i.e. pagans)."
You just contradicted yourself. Your so desperate to inaccurately defend Islam and demonize everyone else. You dont even see it! LOL!
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
In the U.S. goes to great length in order to not hit civilians! But Muslims on the other hand are the ones who walk into markets, universities, buildings and blow themselves up.
ALLAH AKBAR! BOOOOOOOMMMMM! Woman and children slaughtered in the streets!
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
That is terrorism. Killing women and children is not Islamic as you yourself embarrassingly proved just now. That is not a night attack and thus would fall under prohibition mentioned in several other Surah, one of which you just quoted.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Perfect example. Allah = God. Muslims believe that whether or not you do and we're talking about Islamic. Christians and Jews believe both in God and in the Last Day. To a very large degree, and we cannot know how much at the time of Muhammad, Christians and Jew forbid the same things as we do. Acknowledging does not mean practicing. Paying tribute was certainly practiced by Christians as well as Muslims who often demanded people they ruled practice their religion.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
So, taken out of the context that Christians in fact did almost exactly the same thing for centuries, this may seem somehow unique to someone ignorant of history.
01andak in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
No, actually I'm saying it is abundantly clear that you do not know it. Try reading a little more maybe on some Muslim rather than non-Muslim sources. You seem to have covered the evangelical stereotype of what Islam is pretty well in your research. Reading quotes from the Quran as preinterpreted by anti-Muslim hate mongers doesn't count. You've missed the point of those quotes entirely.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
I don't really see that much difference in what you wrongly think we believe and how you yourself act towards Muslims. You think we are unclean and liars and murderers and rapists. So you refuse to hear anything any of us says. How does spending your day making hundreds of millions of peaceful people hated make you superior to us?
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
LOL! So your saying that Allah and Mohamed are wrong?
How am I acting towars Muslims? Having dialog with them and speaking to them about what Islamic doctrine is? So you dont see any difference between me speaking about Islam and Islam commanding Muslims to fight, subjugate, or kill all non Mulsims?
Again I am not referring to Muslims. And now you are demonizing me, for posting factual evidence form the Quran. Instead of criticizing Islam, you attack me for dialog and facts! Typical!
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Quote " How does spending your day making hundreds of millions of peaceful people hated make you superior to us?"
Again your a hypocrite. You want me to ignore the Quran, hadith and tafsirs, and listen to your revisionism. And you fail to be critical of Islamic doctrine that commands far worse than me being critical of an intolerant and violent ideology! Your Completely inconsistent and hypocritical.
I am not talking about people, I am talking about Islam, 4 the 5th time!
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
What you take for fact is one single interpretation out of many. For you to say the actions of less than 1% of Muslims is typical of the rest of us, or that because some of us commit crimes it's due to religion and that some of us don't it's despite it, is logically unsound. It's like if I judged Christianity on Charles Manson's interpretation of the Bible. Or Torquemada's, or Savanarola's or many other famous intolerant mass murderers under the banner of Christianity.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
It is impossible that any religion as old or as wide spread as Islam should have only one interpretation. It is equally impossible that any institution so obviously faulty as what you hold Islam to be would spread in the first place. Why would anyone given the choice hold to it if that was true? You don't ever ask yourself such simple questions.
01andak in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
This is a frightening admission on your part. You see know difference in dialog and criticism of Islam to the direct commands from Allah and Mohamed to fight all non Muslims!
Here you go again. Appealing to Muslims when I am speaking about Islamic doctrine! So what interpretation did I use that is tantamount to Charles Manson? I didnt realize that Manson was a Christian, or a Scholar equal to Imaam Bukhair or your Quran!
Thats a fascinating comparison you have made there! LOL
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
So your saying that Islam has no absolutes? Its all up to interpetation? So what is the sense of following Islam if your actually following a mans subjective interpretation?
I am the one using YOUR scholars, and YOUR Quran. And YOUR Historical accounts of Mohamed sunna that 90% of the worlds Muslims adhere to!
And your going to appeal to Charles Manson as a Christian authority?
You have just lost any semblance of credibility and integrity! LOL! Your absurd!
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
You assume that all Muslims ever do is killing and rape. Lesser Jihad, if you wrongly insist on defining it that way doesn't appear as a pillar of Islam or even in the first 51 books of Bukhari. It is not a central theme of Islam or it would be a pillar. For that matter, if it was as you say then 1.2 billion people would be engaged in violent acts. I can't imagine with what mental gymnastics you explain that to yourself.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
How many times do I have to repeat myself? Why do you keep lying and making these absurd accusations. I have said it now 6 times. I am not talking about all Muslims! You are a fucking liar! I have never said such a thing nor do i believe it! You atre making more logical fallacies.
Just because all Muslims do not adhere to all of the factual teachings of Islam does not mean that they are not factual. Most Muslims are in denial and more loyal to their humanity than their religion.
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
You keep appealing to people because you know that you cannot defned the doctrine or Mohamed sunna!
your the one playing mental gymnastics by lying, and using logical fallacies! Oh and making assertions that I said something when I didnt! You disgust me! Sahih BukhARI - Sunni Muslims view this as one of the three most trusted collections of hadith along with Sahih Muslim and al-Muwatta . In some circles, it is considered the most authentic book after the Qur'an
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Consider that many Muslims would not even think of amputating a thief's hand. Does this mean that it is against Islam to do so? Of course not! In fact, it is clearly mandated in both the Qur'an (5:38) and the example set by Muhammad according to the Hadith (Bukhari 81:792). As individuals, Muslims make their own choices about which parts of their religion they practice.
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
That's true and people get university degrees in how to interpret hadith. To do that, you need historical perspective. For example, if people are in a trench being attacked by a confederation of enemies, they might say things that someone sitting in their living room might not. Muslims were in such a trench in Medina. In fact, it was called the battle of the Trench. Trenches are not offensive structures, they are defensive.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
HAHAH! And you are being very selective in your depiction! As usual!
Allah's Messenger: “Proceed on and do not look about until Allah grants you victory,” and Ali went a bit and then halted and did not look about and then said in a loud voice: “Allah's Messenger, on what issue should I fight with the people?” Thereupon he (the Prophet) said: ”Fight with them until they bear testimony to the fact that there is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his Messenger…” (Sahih Muslim 5917)
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Many causes feed into any conflict, but one stands out. Muslim raiders harassed Meccan trade. Modern Saudi biographer Safi-ur-Rahman al-Mubarakpuri expresses the right idea: . . . "[I]t was wise for the Muslims to bring the commercial routes leading to Makkah [Mecca] under their control" (p. 201). Then he lists eight raids between 623 and the Battle of Badr in AD 624. In each one, Muslims were the aggressors, to accomplish the big objective of strangling Mecca’s trade.
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
What people are we talking about? Oh yeah, the Meccans who persecuted the Muslims, boycotted them until they had to leave Mecca for Medina during the Hijrah (flight). In fact, they were chased and threatened as far as Abbysinia (Ethopia). So how do generals talk during a war? Of course! George Patton was a pussycat, right?  NOT!!!
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
And you should no doubt be familiar with what the Bible quotes Joshua or Moses or Samson or King David saying about their enemies and how God stands in approval of all the bloodshed. Do you have a particular problem with that? Is that what Judaism is? Should we sit in judgement of people because of quotes???
01andak in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
A few centuries later, the Mongols arrived with the type of intention that you ascribe to Muslims. They really did kill everybody because they could and they wanted to. The Crusaders waded in blood up to their knees killing many Jews. BECAUSE THERE WERE JEWS, living under Muslim rule as they did for centuries. Conversely, they were repeatedly banished from Europe.
01andak in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
So what you imply, that we want to kill all the non-believers is something the Mongols or the Nazis managed in a period of a few years. If that was the case, Muslims would not have taken over 1000 years to do it. But they didn't, because that was neither what Islam taught, nor what they were prone to do.
01andak in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Does that mean that Muslims were blameless? NO! Their system, though more merciful than that of the Christians was highly unequal and often abusive. But the fact is, given the alternative, non-Muslims fled persecution to the Islamic world and stayed for centuries.
01andak in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
Another lie. Show me what system was more merciful than the doctrine of Christ to love all people even your enemies!
And agin you are appealing to one instance! Not all of Islamic history! Your attempting to make it appear as though through out history Jews and Christians fled to Islamic lands to flee persecution! Thats just not so! And yo know it! This was one or two instances! And it certainly does not coincide with Islamic doctrine to be charitable or protective of kufares!
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
HAHAAH! I am not implying that all Muslims want to kill all the non believers! I am making the factual statement that Islam commands all Muslims to subjugate or kill all non believers!
Again you are misrepresenting what i said! You really have no integrity at all! Really the Mongols and the Nazi succeeded? What history books are you reading? LOL!
Another lie and misrepresentation. And all Muslims are not united! Like I said on many occasions! You have no integrity at all!
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
I guess you'll have to repeat it until someone besides you who can read actually believes it. So if I get this straight, the vast majority of Muslims don't follow Islam because we are good people. Where as the few who do are terrorists? Because the actual pillars of Islam, its core values, you can't mention without spoiling your argument. You seem disappointed that we all don't go out and kill people like you think we should.
01andak in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
You dont believe the Quran ,hadith, and tafsirs? Great. Then why do you call yourself a Muslim? LOL! Yes they are good people not because of Islam, but in spite of Islam. ANd like yourself ignore, deny, revise, and mold Islam into what they wish it were and is, instead of what it is and always has been! Your not even arguing with me. Your actually arguing with Islam. Another ad hominum and fallacious assertion,.prove I am disappointed! All you do is lie and use fallacious arguments.
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
So your saying that if there are some aspects of Islam that could be viewed as moral or just that they discount or erase all of the other aspects of Islam that are completely unjust and immoral?
LOL! So you just want people to view Islam in a narrow minded way not in its totality?
So if there are a set of rules that consist of rape, murder, bigotry, fascism, child molestation, wife beating, extortion, etc.. but also says to give to charity its all good? LOL! Logical fallacy #15
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
BWAHAHAHA! She is saying that it might come to those terms! Ok now be consistent!~ You want to demonize her for saying that it MIGHT take an attack to stop them! Now compare her assertion of a possible future attack that MIGHT need to occur! Ok, lets be consistent!
Bukhari (8:387) - Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah'. Show me what a hypocrite you are! This puts all non Muslims in danger!
Thedickknows in risposta a 01andak (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa
You want more? OK, Now these are far more dangerous and clear then her statement of a possible scenario!
Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth
Muslim (1:30) - "The Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah."
Now expose your hypocrisy?
Thedickknows in risposta a Thedickknows (Mostra il commento) 7 mesi fa



YouTube


thecopticmartyrs2 ha pubblicato un commento
1 secondo fa
@666 CIA Blake Darothic --> parasite parasite parasite. you do not know a more dignified way to earn a living? parasite parasite parasite, parasite parasite hanger-on parasite minions scrounger scrounger, parasite

thecopticmartyrs2 ha pubblicato un commento
2 minuti fa
we have seen, such as Anglo American, were the accomplices of: Tito's Communist .. and they have delivered, the partisans Dalmatians, ie, 12,000 unarmed soldiers Slovenian: called "domobranci" (defenders of the fatherland) for be, all killed die. as a criminal regime tyranny, occult, is that, of all false democracies Masonic, of seigniorage banking, in fact, the genocide of the Carso, is for more than 50 years, that, has never existed .. that's why this is the scam of democracy, indeed, democracy has never existed, because: a democracy can not be Masonic: and without monetary sovereignty, stolen by the Illuminati Jews, that are, the first enemies of Judaism of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, that is, , the first enemies of Israel .. would have been better for you, if you had never been born!

Blake Darothic ha pubblicato un commento
2 minuti fa
NOBODY CARES V

thecopticmartyrs2 ha pubblicato un commento
11 minuti fa
Ephesians 5: (3) But as befits the saints, nor immorality or any impurity or greed even be named among you, (4) the same can be said of dishonesty, the silly talk and buffoonery, which things are inconvenient, but rather thanksgiving to abound. (5) this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God (6) No one deceive you with empty words, for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience. (7) Do not be their companions.

Blake Darothic ha pubblicato un commento
15 minuti fa
Take your religion and shove it up your ass.

thecopticmartyrs2 ha pubblicato un commento
22 minuti fa
Allah is an enemy to unbelievers (christians etc. ..). - Sura 2:98 On unbelievers is the curse of Allah. - Sura 2:161 Slay them wherever ye find them and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution is worse than slaughter. - 2:191 Fight against them until idolatry is no more and Allah's religion reigns supreme. (different translation:) Fight them until there is no persecution and the religion is God's entirely. - Sura 2:193 and 8:39

IHateNEWLAYOUT ha pubblicato un commento
23 minuti fa
666

thecopticmartyrs2 ha pubblicato un commento
25 minuti fa
fromthemoon4 Commento sul tuo video: Mohammed was a False Prophet Wafa Sultan Revelation7:10 And the Devil(ALLAH) who had decieved them(MUSLIMS) was thrown into the lake of fire where the BEAST( ALLAH copying the true GOD the ALPHA and OMEGA) and the FALSE PROPHET (MOHAMMED) were, and they will be TORMENTED DAY and NIGHT FOREVER and EVER. To ALL of you there is still time to ask for forgiveness and ACCEPT JESUS the SON of GOD. Matt.3:17And a VOICE from HEAVEN said"This is MY SON.the Beloved, with whom I am well pleased" Son of Man=MAN, Son of GOD=GOD. -- answer --> Allah is not responsible, if Muhammad is a criminal! but, it is the fact that Muslims are total dickheads, that, 666 Rothschild, and 322, Bush NWO, they bet on the fact, to be able to succeed, destroy Israel, because this is their agenda? but, with Israel, even my holy Islam will be lost!

thecopticmartyrs2 ha pubblicato un commento
1 ora fa
FreeMiddleEast Hamas will not help a free Palestine Why ahmoud Abbas are you making friends with Hamas? The same organization that has only hurt your people. Watch our video, and comment. --ANSWER-->no! i am not terrorist, i am not HAMAS, i am king of Israel

thecopticmartyrs2 ha pubblicato un commento
1 ora fa
Slovenian forces hostile to communist aggression (that is allied with the "-American dogs" dogs: 322, and Their masters Pharisees Zionists IMF 666: Talmud for the NWO: ie the true instigators of the Shaoh), organized an armed body of men called "domobranci" (defenders of the fatherland), which in May 1945, after the war, together with their Families (oz Already betrayed: by the Zionist: fake allies: masonic Anglo American: for banking seigniorage) (accomplices of the Communists) were forced to take refuge in the provinces occupied: by the British, relying on Their protection. Unfortunately, at the end of the month (to treason), 12,000 unarmed soldiers Slovenian: and Their family, were taken up on trains (freight cars), with the insurance of the British, who were sent to Italy, However, were betrayed : the Zionist Anglo American: ie masonic system: for the second time, and were delivered to Titus

thecopticmartyrs2 ha pubblicato un commento
1 ora fa
(because Those heroes were: committed: in a crime too great, from the point of view of the IMF, ie, had saved his life: of 200,000 Jews, who were fleeing from the Balkans: and who hid from the Nazis, but , just That crime? Rothschild: Nazis, the Pharisee of Baal, he could not forgive, to beautifull Those Italians!) But, Titus, as taken: Those over Catholic saints, after being tortured: cruelly, for days, then: put them all: into the sinkholes: or sinkholes, karst: with the accomplices of Americans: this innocent martyrs: 200,000, Italians were the martyrs of That genocide. One of the British, who had objected: to this slaughter of refugees Slovenian and Italian Catholics, was John Corsellis, a Quaker pacifist, Which were no military service, but he was as a volunteer Took care to assist civilian refugees. (John Corsellis and Marcus Ferrar, "Slovenia 1945. Memories of death and survival after the second world war." Arianna Publishing 2008. LEG Library Publishing Gorizia presents)